As tensions with Iran continue to escalate, observers seem largely convinced that the Trump administration's "maximum pressure" campaign is to blame—there's no reason to believe Iran would resort to things like sabotaging ships unless provoked, Paul Pillar writes at LobeLog—but Richard Haass of the Council on Foreign Relations suggests one possible off-ramp. Writing at Project Syndicate, Haass suggests President Trump could reengage with Iran and seek a nuclear deal "2.0," in effect replicating the situation that generated the Obama-led agreement in 2015, with sanctions pressuring Tehran to negotiate longer-term limits on its nuclear program and restrictions on more points of contention, like ballistic missiles. Iran appears reluctant to concede much (Middle East Institute President Paul Salem has predicted the current situation will persist until the next US election, at least), but there may be an opening for Trump to seek a new agreement and improve upon the original deal, Haass suggests. |