The United States might have the upper hand in any trade war with China. But that doesn't extend to America's farmers, suggests Andrew Egger in The Weekly Standard. And the Trump administration's $12 billion "Band-Aid" of a bailout isn't going to save them. "Although the United States buys more products overall from China than it sells to the Chinese, the opposite is true of [agricultural] commodities. China, by far the world's largest agricultural importer, has in recent decades grown into a crucial market for US farmers, particularly soybean growers…But as trade tensions have grown, China has deliberately begun to wean itself from US farm markets, instituting retaliatory tariffs that have made Brazilian soybeans—or even beans grown domestically in China—more attractive to Chinese buyers," Egger writes. "International trade markets are not easy to rebuild. Once the Chinese give up US agriculture, there's no telling how long it will take for them to return to our markets—if they ever return at all. This would leave the Trump administration with two unsavory options: Provide huge agriculture bailouts year over year indefinitely, or allow thousands of US farms to go belly-up as a direct result of its trade policies." |